single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized clinical trial study
نویسندگان
چکیده
background: surgical technique using small-diameter instruments and single-incision laparoscopy are two new options for less invasive laparoscopic cholecystectomy (lc). in this study, we have compared mini-lc (mlc) with single-incision lc (silc). materials and methods: this study is a randomized clinical trial conducted on the patients diagnosed with symptomatic cholelithiasis who underwent lc. forty patients were randomized to two equal groups of mlc and silc. they were compared in terms of demographic data, operation time, and surgical complications. results: baseline characteristics were similar in two groups. operation time in mlc was significantly shorter than that in silc (45.1 ± 69 min vs 63.75 ± 7.57 min, p-value < 0.001). also, the total length of the wound in silc group was shorter than that in mlc group (p-value < 0.003). postoperative pain scores were similar in two groups.hospital stay was shorter in mlc (1.2 ± 0.6 days vs 1.6 ± 0.8 days, p < 0.021). there was no difference in postoperative complications in two groups. conclusion: mlc because of less operation time is preferred than silc. also, by subjective measures, it was a more comfortable method compared to silc.
منابع مشابه
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized clinical trial study.
BACKGROUND Surgical technique using small-diameter instruments and single-incision laparoscopy are two new options for less invasive laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). In this study, we have compared mini-LC (MLC) with single-incision LC (SILC). MATERIALS AND METHODS This study is a randomized clinical trial conducted on the patients diagnosed with symptomatic cholelithiasis who underwent LC....
متن کاملSingle-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus traditional four-port cholecystectomy.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has traditionally been performed using multiple small sites. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery has emerged as an alternative technique to improve cosmesis and minimize complications associated with multiple incisions. A retrospective study was performed of all patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy by a single surgeon (DTA) from April 2008 to August ...
متن کاملOutcome of Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC) versus conventional four port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Cholelithiasis - A Randomized control trial
Aim: To compare the outcome of SIL (single incision laparoscopic) cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: Two hundred patients are included in this study fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria and arerandomly divided into two equal groups (100 in each). Results: Both the Groups were comparable and there is statistically significant differenc...
متن کاملThe comparison of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and three port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective randomized study
PURPOSE Laparoscopic techniques have allowed surgeons to perform complicated intra-abdominal surgery with minimal trauma. Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) was developed with the aim of reducing the invasiveness of conventional laparoscopy. In this study we aimed to compare results of SILS cholecystectomy and three port conventional laparoscopic (TPCL) cholecystectomy prospectively. ...
متن کاملRobotic single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Single-port laparoscopy attempts to further reduce the surgical impact of minimally invasive surgery when compared to conventional laparoscopy [1–4]. Single-port laparoscopy might in general result in enhanced cosmetic outcomes and potentially reduced pain when compared to the conventional multi-port technique [5–8]. While manual single-port laparoscopy comes with certain technical limitations ...
متن کاملمنابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
journal of research in medical sciencesجلد ۲۰، شماره ۱۲، صفحات ۰-۰
میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023